The Twenty-Ninth Sunday in Ordinary Time



JEREMIAH 31:31-34: "This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Drink this, remembering me." With these words Jesus of Nazareth on the last night of his life brought into the New Testament one of the most profound moments of the Old. Jeremiah had proclaimed, "The days are surely coming when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. . . . I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people."



William Holladay (Jeremiah, A Fresh Reading, 128-132) provides a context for this prophecy. He said that every seven years, from 620 to 586, the Book of Deuteronomy was publicly read to all the people. The first reading took place when the book was discovered during a rebuilding of the temple. The last reading took place in 586, the year the temple was destroyed by Babylonian armies.



Deuteronomy was the book of the Second Covenant. Building on the work of Moses six centuries before, when God had declared that the Hebrews in the desert were his people and he was their God, Deuteronomy renewed that covenant between God and people. The book had appeared at a time of crisis in Judah. Assyrian armies were marching up and down the land. Egyptian armies were marching through the land to meet them. Jerusalem was sequestered on its high hill, but no one knew whether it was safe from the marauders. King Josiah, a young boy new to the throne of Judah, took a bold step. He ordered his workers to remove the statues of Assyrian gods that had been erected in the temple of the Lord. (They had been put there by the Assyrians to show that the Assyrian gods were stronger than Judah's God.) He ordered that the temple be rebuilt so that its only God once more would be Yahweh. This was an act of treason against Assyria but of independence for Judah.



While the work was being carried out, a book was found in the temple. The book contained words of Moses. It said that God had given his law to Israel and Judah, and it set out in great detail the laws that God had given. It said that if Israel or Judah failed to keep this law, God would bring up enemies to destroy them. King Josiah heard the law read (apparently he himself could not read), and he was struck to the heart. He ordered the law read to all the people, so that all Judah could organize its life to conform with the law. The first reading of the law was in the year 621.



Every seven years thereafter, in autumn of the seventh year, the people assembled to hear the law read. It was read in 614 and in 607 and in 600 and in 593. Now it was 586. In August of that year, Babylonian armies burned the Temple, the palace, and all the main houses of the city. They destroyed its walls. The Babylonians took the king of Judah and most of its leading citizens into exile in Babylon. It was a moment of desolation that Jewish people would remember forever. Would the book be read again this year to the bereaved and grieving people of Judah?



Holladay insisted that it was. In October, two months after the destruction, the priests gathered the remaining people together at the site of the destroyed temple. They began to read the book to the people as they had done for 35 years. In that dramatic moment, the prophet Jeremiah stepped forward, suggests Holladay, to bring a new message to the people.



Jeremiah had believed for some time that Deuteronomy did not represent what God wanted of the people. The covenant with God that Deuteronomy represented called for the people to keep God's law perfectly, to hold fast to every jot and tittle that was written there. Jeremiah recalled that the relationship of Yahweh and people in the desert was much more dynamic than that. Yahweh had given the people not a set of laws to bind them to him. Yahweh had given them his own living word. The people were to hear the word and build their lives around it. The relationship of Yahweh and people had not been that of memorizing a set of rules. It was more like a conversation between two parties, both of whom had moral responsibility for what occurred. Jeremiah wanted the people to resume their conversation with God, not just commit to memory rules and regulations purporting to come from God. It was a revolutionary step. So, as the priests stepped forward to read the law to the people once more, Jeremiah stepped forward also to deliver his message. This is what he said.



"The days are surely coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. It will not be like the covenant that I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt - a covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, says the Lord. But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. No longer shall they teach one another, or say to each other, 'Know the Lord,' for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, says the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and remember their sin no more."



The revolutionary nature of Jeremiah's prophecy can be seen in its first line. This new covenant will be with both Israel and Judah. But, the people must have protested, Israel had been gone this last century and a half, destroyed by Assyrian armies one hundred fifty years ago. Make a covenant with Israel? Indeed God will, said Jeremiah. God is doing a new thing. God will restore Israel. God will resurrect this people. The new covenant is with both Israel and Judah.



"I will make this new covenant because I am their husband," said the Lord. This too must have struck the ears of the people as a strange saying. The word for "husband" was the very word that the followers of the baals had used to describe the relationship between baal and people. It carried all the connotations of Canaanite worship. Yet Hosea had used the idea. Israel is my bride, and I am her husband, the God of Hosea had said. I will love her and care for her and ask of her that she be faithful to me. Husbands and wives talk with each other, have affection for each other, are loyal to each other, make plans together, respond to each other. If only Judah would do this with me, said the Lord. She is my wife. I am her husband.



"I will put my law within them, I will write it on their hearts." The word "heart" as Jeremiah used it meant not a center of affection but a center of decision. People would make their decisions on the basis of "the inward law of God," the inward conversation with the living God which the new covenant made possible. Jeremiah went so far as to say "they shall no longer teach each other." The "teaching" being done was "rote memory." Someone would read the law, and the people would woodenly recite it until they knew each word. Then in a wooden manner they would apply the words to the situations of their lives. That is wrong, said Jeremiah! God is not a wooden memory which Judah recites. God is a lively conversationalist to whom Judah must respond. We shall not teach one another in this manner, for we shall each know the living Lord.



The most important word was reserved for the last pronouncement. "I will forgive their iniquity, says the Lord. I will remember their sin no more." Israel and Judah, with their rebellions against God, had destroyed the former covenant. God had remembered their acts, and God had punished them for their treasons. That day is over, said Jeremiah. Israel is gone, Judah is gone, Jerusalem is destroyed - that is punishment enough. Now I will forgive their sins, and I will not remember their iniquities, says the Lord. "I will be their God, and they shall be my people."



Strangely enough, this pronouncement of Jeremiah was largely forgotten. Nowhere else in the Old Testament is it referred to. As far as that book is concerned, it is as if Jeremiah had never said it. Two groups of people, however, remembered what Jeremiah had said, and his words became important to them. One group was the little community of people who had gathered on the shores of the Dead Sea to rebuild their lives and the life of all Judah. This was the group at Qumran, new covenanters who believed that Jeremiah's words about a new covenant were spoken for them. The other group was the Christian Church.



Jesus gathered his disciples for one last meal. They had come to Jerusalem for the feast of passover. Jesus had entered the city to great acclaim, he had cleansed the temple of its impurities, he had taught the people. Now he knew that Jewish priests and Roman officials were conspiring to kill him. One of his disciples, Judas, had contributed to the plot. As that spring evening died across the Mount of Olives and its darkness shrouded all Jerusalem, Jesus had carefully led his disciples through the twisted streets of the city. They came to a house where they were to eat the passover meal. They were admitted to the house and went to a large upper room furnished and ready. Jesus took a loaf of bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, "This is my body that is for you. Do this in remembrance of me." In the same way he took the cup also, after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me." They all ate and drank. Jeremiah's new covenant had been fulfilled at last.



PSALM 119:97-104: This psalm is the longest psalm in the psalter, 176 verses in all, and in some ways it is the most interesting. It consists of twenty-two stanzas of eight lines each. It is organized as an acrostic, that is, each of the stanza begins with the next equivalent letter of the Hebrew alphabet, and the first word in each line of the stanza begins with the same letter. (The third chapter of Lamentations follows a similar scheme, except that each stanza is only three verses long.) The poem praises Torah, the Hebrew Law which had been put into an integrated form during the time of Judah's exile in Babylon. Clinton McCann, (Presbyterian Worship Planner) points out that its size and repetition are important to its message: "The repetition and formal structure," he says, "create and reiterate the message of the psalm. God's 'law' -- that is, God's 'instruction' or 'word' or 'revelation' -- is all-encompassing and all-important for humankind."



Torah, as this psalmist understands it, is more than the commandments of a law. It sets forth God's will and purpose for God's people. The message of the psalm is commensurate with its form. Life, says this psalmist, is safe and predictable and reliable when it is built around Torah (Brueggemann, Message) The Torah gives life to the people of Judah, but to receive the life the people had to be obedient to it. Those who keep Torah know what God wants of them, and they respond accordingly.



The lection, the 13th strophe of the psalm, falls close to the middle of the total work. It begins "How I love the law, God's instruction to me. On it I meditate all the day." This is close to the words of the First Psalm, "My delight is in the instruction of the Lord, and on this instruction I meditate both day and night." The psalmist knows that only when one "loves" something can one truly know it. "Love of the law" involves returning to constantly as one returns to his or her beloved, thinking about it, exploring it deeply, taking in its fulness. One can only "know" the law "when it is ever with me."



This instruction, says the psalmist, makes me wiser than my enemies, wiser than my teachers, wiser than the aged men in the community. This wisdom comes when I keep God's torah ever before me; when I meditate upon its testimonies; when I keep my feet from every evil way.



The strophe closes with a metaphor. "Your words are sweet to my taste, sweeter than honey to my mouth!" What could be sweeter than that.



LUKE 18:1-8: This is a "how much more" parable. If the unjust judge will grant the widow's petition when she perseveres in putting it before him, "how much more" will God answer our petitions when we ask him?



Apparently the situation of which Jesus spoke in this parable was by no means unique. H B Tristram (Eastern Customs in Bible Lands) gave a vivid description of a woman coming daily to the Cad, the judge, in order to present her case. The hall was crowded with people, each demanding that their case be heard. The wise ones gave bribes to the secretaries. Their business was quickly dispatched. The poor woman broke through the proceedings with loud cries for justice. She was sternly bidden to keep quiet, but she came every day. "And I will not keep quiet," she loudly exclaimed, "until the Cadi hears my case." At length, at the end of the session, the Cadi impatiently asked, "What does the woman want?" Her story was soon told. The tax collector was demanding payment from her, although her only son was on military service. The case was quickly decided and her patience was rewarded. If she had had money to pay a clerk she would have obtained justice much sooner. It is an exact modern analogy to Luke's story.



As Jesus tells it, the widow had brought her case to the judge. Widows had a special claim on judges. A widow could not inherit her husband's estate. That went to his sons. She was cast out upon the community, with no resources of her own. Judges were supposed to respect the rights of widows. The Book of Deuteronomy reports Moses' charge to judges: "Give the members of your community a fair hearing, and judge rightly between one person and another, whether citizen or resident alien. You must not be partial in judging: hear out the small and the great alike; you shall not be intimidated by anyone, for the judgment is God's" (Deut 1:16-17 NRSV). Claiming her right, this widow went to the judge to seek the justice due her. He did not hear her case. Day after day as he sat in the street of the village, where people would come to adjudicate their cases, she came to him. She even began to come in the middle of the night and cry out her case. He would not listen to her. She was too unimportant to take up his time.



Finally, however, the judge decides that since the widow is bothering him so much, he will hear her case. We are not told what his judgment was, for or against her. That is not the point of the story. Its point is that by her persistence, her case was made. How much more do we need to pray persistently, said Jesus! How much more will God answer our prayers! "Will not God grant justice to his chosen ones?" said Jesus. "Will he delay long in helping them? I tell you, he will quickly grant justice to them." The God of Jesus Christ listens to the cry of the poor with unwearied patience. He is moved with compassion for their need, and suddenly he intervenes for their deliverance.



As with other parables, there is a conclusion added to this one that may not have been included in the original story. Verse 8 adds, "When the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?" This sentence, looking to the end of days when the Son appears again, is most likely an interpretation of the story added to it by the early scribes and preachers of the church.



B. Reid ("The Ethics of Luke," BibToday 31 [5, '93] 283-287) gives a fitting conclusion to the parable. He says that this parable provides a good illustration of the social and ethical demands of Christian life. It invites followers of Jesus to fear God, to respect other human beings, and to seek God's justice persistently. These demands were placed on Jesus' disciples in the original generation, and they are placed upon us today.



SECOND TIMOTHY 3:14-4:5: This passage has another of those epigrams that Second Timothy adores. This one reads "All scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work."



The phrase "All scripture is inspired by God" has been used to say that every passage of Scripture, each being directly inspired by God, is equal to every other passage of Scripture, and that we have to approach the book as if there are no distinctions to be made in turning from the Old Testament Leviticus and Numbers to the New Testament Mark and John (in fact, at the time of its writing, there probably was no Mark or John!). This passage does not say that; it does not even suggest it. The passage is found in the midst of a discussion of what Timothy has learned from his Christian sources.



One such source comes from the sacred writings. "From childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings which are able to instruct you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus." The "sacred writings" were the books of the Law, of the Prophets, and of the Writings." In other words, they were what we call "the Hebrew Scriptures," "The Old Testament." The criterion by which they were read is found in the second part of the statement: They "are able to instruct you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus." It was Jesus Christ for whom the readers of Scripture were searching, and they found him in those books. They found him in the person of Adam, and they contrasted the first Adam with the second Adam, Jesus Christ. They found him in the person of King David; Jesus was the heir to the kingdom of David. They found him in the "new covenant" prophecy of Jeremiah. They found him in the Suffering Servant of Isaiah of Babylon. As they found Christ in their Scriptures, they also found salvation through faith in him. Whatever spoke of Jesus Christ in this Hebrew Bible was a sacred writing that led you to salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.



The second source was composed of the instructors that Timothy had in the faith. "Continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it." We know from other parts of the letter that Timothy's primary teachers were his mother Eunice, his grandmother Lois, and his mentor Paul. The Scriptures were his school, and those named were his teachers. From them he learned about Jesus Christ. From them he learned how to act, think, and live as a Christian.



The Scriptures had a primary place in this school of the faith. "All scripture is inspired by God." The word translated "inspired" is a most unusual one: "God-breathed" is as close as we can come to it in English. It is as if when we read the Scripture, the actual breath of God breathes upon us, and this breath re-creates and renews us as the breath of God did when it breathed upon the chaos of the universe and first created our world. This "God-breathed" book plays many roles in our life. It is profitable for teaching; from it we learn the way of Jesus Christ. It is profitable for reproof; it calls out to us when we wander from the straight and narrow way. It is profitable for correction; it pulls us back when like the lost sheep we wander too far from its path. It is profitable for training in righteousness; it restores us to right terms with God, our neighbor, the world around us, and ourselves. All this centers in the person of Christ. He it is who teaches us, who reproves us, who corrects us, who brings to us our longed-for righteousness.


Scripture has a purpose in doing so: "that the person of God may be complete, equipped for every good work." What that means is described in subsequent verses: the person of God is to "preach the word, be urgent in season and out of season, convince, rebuke, and exhort, be unfailing in patience and in teaching, . . . always be steady, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfil your ministry." The instruction is directed to Timothy as a minister and as a successor to Paul. It is also directed at us who are part of the church of Christ today. Urgently we are to present the good news of the gospel, do it with great patience, and be willing to suffer for Christ if the need arise.



Paul frames this around the situation of the day and the future coming of Christ. The situation is not good. People to whom Timothy was to preach will not endure sound teaching, but their ears are always itching for the sensational teachers, the bewitching ones. They will turn from listening to the truth and wander into myths and fantasies. But remember: Christ will come. He will judge the living and the dead. He will bring with him his own reign of justice, righteousness, and truth.